Ancient Science of China中国古代科学
← Catalogue
Master Who Embraces Simplicity抱朴子
JinNatural PhilosophyComplete山

抱朴子

Master Who Embraces Simplicity

Ge Hong
葛洪 · Ge Hong

Ge Hong's 4th-century work documents laboratory alchemical procedures — arsenic sulfide purification, mercury extraction from cinnabar, metallic dissolution — alongside natural philosophy. It articula…

About This Work

Ge Hong's 4th-century work documents laboratory alchemical procedures — arsenic sulfide purification, mercury extraction from cinnabar, metallic dissolution — alongside natural philosophy. It articulates a proto-experimental methodology emphasizing reproducible observation, controlled conditions, and skepticism toward untested claims about the natural world.

Contents · 内容

Inner Ch.1: The Way — Setting Forth the Principles内篇 畅玄
Inner Ch.2-3: On Immortals, Responding to Skeptics内篇 论仙 对俗
Inner Ch.4: The Gold Elixir — Laboratory Methods内篇 金丹
Inner Ch.5-6: The Ultimate Principle, Gradual Attainment内篇 至理 微旨
Inner Ch.7-8: Countering Obstacles, Escaping Constraints内篇 塞难 释滞
Inner Ch.9-10: The True Meaning, Clarifying the Root内篇 道意 明本
Inner Ch.11-14: Materia Medica, Elixir Types, Broad Survey内篇 仙药 辨问 极言 勤求
Inner Ch.15-17: Miscellaneous Responses, Ascending, Geography内篇 杂应 黄白 登涉
Inner Ch.18-20: Earthbound Genuineness, Withdrawal, Elimination内篇 地真 遐览 袪惑
Outer Ch.1-25: Social Criticism, Confucian Discourse, Governance外篇 嘉遁 逸民 勖学 君道 臣节 贵贤
Outer Ch.26-50: Literature, Conduct, Appointments, Fate, Self-Cultivation外篇 任命 安贫 博喻 广譬 辞义 自叙

Why This Matters

This text is part of the living archive of Chinese intellectual achievement — a tradition that produced systematic astronomical observation, mathematical innovation, medical frameworks still in clinical use, and engineering at continental scale, centuries before comparable developments in Europe.

The question "did ancient China have science?" misunderstands what science is. Science is not a single cultural tradition — it is the systematic observation of nature, the rigorous documentation of phenomena, the testing of ideas against evidence, and the building of knowledge across generations. By every one of these measures, the works in this catalogue are scientific. They used different conceptual frameworks — correlative rather than mechanistic, systemic rather than reductionist — but these frameworks produced real knowledge: accurate star catalogues, effective medical treatments, precise calendar computations, and technologies that transformed civilization.